
Garden Orb Spider on Ash Island. Photo: E Burton © E Burton.
About Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project
The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) is a project of the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority. KWRP covers 1590 hectares on three sites in the Hunter River estuary adjacent to a major port and industrial complex as well as a large urban area (Newcastle) in New South Wales. It is one of the largest active coastal rehabilitation projects in Australia. KWRP was initiated in 1993 to compensate for the loss of fish, shorebird and other wildlife habitat in the Hunter estuary caused by 200 years of draining, filling and clearing.
The wetlands features mangrove and saltmarsh, and in non-tidal areas, riparian woodlands, remnants of lowland floodplain rainforest and ephemeral, freshwater wetlands.
KWRP has focused on adaptive ecosystem management. With increased knowledge gained through research, management of threatened species (e.g. green and golden bell frog, white cynanchum) and ecological communities (e.g. saltmarsh) has become a central feature of rehabilitation activities.
Find out more about KWRP http://www.hcr.cma.nsw.gov.au/kooragang/
How is Web2Spider being used at the wetlands?
KWRP communications officer, Sue Rostas, attended a BugWise workshop at Tocal in November 2007. Sue saw great potential in the use of Web2Spider at the wetlands and led a team of volunteers in collecting data in plots of differing ages. Sue and her volunteers were interested in determining if diversity and abundance increased with rehabilitation age. The rationale for doing this was to assess the recovery of web-building spider communities, with a view that the recovery trajectory could be used as baseline for future monitoring and assessment.
Results and Discussion
Surveys were conducted over five days (January 16, February 6, March 6, April 2 and 7 May 2008). A total of 1031 webs were counted, the majority (33% of total) of which, were found in the rainforest remnant. Fewest webs were found in the unplanted grassland (21% of total). In revegetated locations, web abundance was intermediate of the unplanted grassland and rainforest remnant (See figures below). Of the two revegetated sites, the semi-mature planting had the higher web abundance (25% of total). Similar patterns to those of web abundance were also found for web diversity. In revegetated locations, web diversity was intermediate of the unplanted grassland and rainforest remnant (See figures below). A total of 27 web types were found with the highest diversity found in the rainforest remnant (21 types) and lowest in unplanted grassland (16 types). Four web-types (W10, W14, W20, W22) were unique to rainforest remnants. There were no web types unique to unplanted grassland as all were found in either revegetation plots or the rainforest remnant. Web type 3 and 23 were unique to semi-mature sites, W7 was unique to the youngest planting, and W15 was only found in revegetation sites.
Results indicated that web diversity and abundance was positively correlated with maturation of the vegetation. The provision of native plants appears to increase both richness and abundance of web-building spiders at the Kooragang Wetlands. These data provide a useful reference curve for which monitoring of future rehabilitation attempts can be compared against. Notably, there were four web types that were found only in the rainforest remnant, and thus are potential indicators of success when taken in isolation.



HI Sue Thanks for your
Posted by: JohnG
HI Sue Thanks for your comments. Yes, I would imagine that heavy rain is a factor. Heavy rain will destroy webs and the spider will wait until for more suitable conditions. Be sure to note this on your data sheets. e.g. surveys done after a period of heavy rain. What you are proposing for streamlining the process sounds sensible. In fact, timed searches is a method often used for survey work. The advantage of timed searches is that it allows you to 'budget' the time you have available. Avoiding areas that you cannot search is OK. You always need to consider safety, and the other thing is, you would probably destroy any webs by crashing your way through the vegetation! On your question about avoiding transects that are not uniform. I would say that your transects should always be randomly placed - so no you shouldnt target sampling for uniform transects. However, it is important that you have noted this, and it is therefore OK to continue in this fashion. Its about consistency in the way you have sampled! Well done on the witches hat webs - they are very obvious and quite active in their web-building at the moment. I have had lots of photos of spectacular examples from around the Hunter and other places in NSW. Are you getting better? I would say that you probably are. Once you become familiar with the guide and the terminology', the method is very efficient. Thanks and keep up the great work. Regards JohnDate: February 12th, 2008
Time: 9.44:28
Questions on survey technique
Posted by: Sue Rostas (not verified)
Hi John It has certainly been wet out here! We managed to do another survey last Wednesday and noted that there were not as many spiders as the previous month (due to heavy rain the night(week) before?). We are trying to streamline the proceedure and have decided to only spend 15 mins per transect and three transects per site. This way we managed three sites instead of the the previous month's one site. It is also difficult to study some of the transects as they are too densely planted. Also should we avoid transect that are not reasonably uniform that is, ones that have virtually only ground cover for 50% of them , then 80% canopy for the other 50%. I will get Christine, one of the team to upload the results. Highlight of the morning for me was the discovery of a witches hat web. It was a first for me. Previously i had wondered whether I would be able to distinguish between a witches hat and a sagging orb - make no mistake - when you see the right web there is no doubting it is a witches hat!! Unfortunately I didn't have my camera!!!! Will correct this oversight next time. We have made slight modification to the recording sheet and work as a team of three. The modifications have sped up the id process - or are we just getting better? (Will send you a copy to check you are happy with the changes.) Cheers SueDate: February 12th, 2008
Time: 9.20:29
Post new comment